Вообщем на т-90МС дураки решетки ставили. Амеры тоже дураки...
вы разницу между предотвращением пробития, и последствиями пробития вобще улавливаете ?
возможно, это все исторические наслоения от старых экранов, просто удаляющих точку подрыва дальше от танка.
срабатывание решеток как "взводящий экран" это худший вариант, но возможный да, и что ? основа принципа это именно попадание между решетками, попробуте найдите описание что решетки работают по каким то гранатам кроме РПГ-7/СПГ-9/передающим импульс от головы до хвоста по токопроводящему конусу.
From the diagram, we can see that the warhead fuze (1) sends an electrical signal via the conductive cone (2), through a conductor (7) to the detonator (8). The outer fairing (3) and (5) complete the circuit. If the rocket is wedged between two horizontal bars, then the inner and outer co-axial conductive cones will short circuit. This means that the impact fuze, even if triggered, will not successfully send an electrical signal to the detonator, due to the short circuit. Therefore, if the cage armour works as intended, it should prevent the warhead from triggering entirely. Figure 7 illustrates this principle.
Figure 7: Deformation of RPG rocket prevents successful triggering of detonator by fuze
Note that even if the warhead of the rocket is somehow triggered, successful formation of a shaped charge jet will be degraded significantly if the conical section of the hollow charge warhead has been deformed by the horizontal bars, resulting in at worst a lightweight EFP with no formation of an elongated jet. This is because the cone angle and symmetry must be carefully maintained for optimal shaped charge jet formation. Thus the penetration efficiency of the shaped charge warhead would be much reduced by such gross deformation.
Отредактировано Wiedzmin (2013-10-30 14:42:41)
